And i still had Blue textures everywhere. But it needs all that RAM to render the textures without looking like a game from the 90ies. The game looks like **** compared to crysis or crysis 2. I ran the latter WITH PHYSX and almost all High settings without AA at a comfy 50fps. I have played almost every damn game there is and i have this beef with many game makers.įor example Compare GTA4 to Mafia 2. So i was actually talking on the topic and not the system requirments of BF3 I'm not sure your specs would meet the recommended minimums :)o
BF3 was fairly playable on my Q6600, 8GB ram EVGA GTX 260 SSC I'm still upgrading my video card when my order arrives next week, but 2GB of ram? come on.
PIXEL 3 BATTLEFIELD 3 UPGRADE
No offense, but you should upgrade your system. I prefer MWs mouse senstivity or whatever it is called.īut i have to say The textures in BF3 look really good.īut still disappointed at how inefficient this engine is. But the fact that on the same system this game performs so bad!. I am disappointed not because it doesnt look better. Play Crysis 2 again ull see what im talking about. Cryengine is way ahead of Frostbite.Everything is scripted. Else you would really see how well it wouldve done. Crysis 2 didnt add so many flashy effects like smoke or places like Iran. it played and looked WAY BETTER than Battlefield 3.
There are some years to FrostBite till i consider it comparable to cryengine 3 If a god damn *****ng game demands a darned Quad Core and a 560 GTX as recommended, how the hell will it not look good, so I'm just asking you guys, what do you think about this? He even stated that Battlefied 3 wasn't that graphically astonishing and he was plainly disappointed by all of the hype created for the game.įor being assured, I told him If he actually installed the Campaign disc into his hard drive, since the Texture pack came preloaded in there, but refuted my argument once more saying that he did. He made the comparison with an Xbox 360, since he doesn't have enough computing power to run any of them. My friend on the other hand stated that Crysis 2 was better graphical looking and that Battlefield 3 wasn't near the toes (graphically) over Crysis 2. In other words, I stated that the frostbite engine 2 can be compared and can actually compete to the CryEngine 3. I personally told him, that Battlefield 3 DOES look good, and can actually catch up on how good does it look to Crysis 2. Recently I've started a dispute, in which game does look better, Crysis 2 or Battlefield 3.
0 kommentar(er)
